MUNDANE MYSTERIES: Why Is A Leg Cramp Called A “Charley Horse”?

Ever experienced a Charley Horse, the painful leg muscle spasm or cramp? If you have, then you know they can hurt like nobody’s business! And, once the pain subsided, you probably found yourself asking, “Who’s this Charley fella & why’s his horse hurting my leg?

Healthline.com says that leg cramps are “generally treatable at home” through stretching, massaging, or icing the affected area, though the associated muscle pain can hang around for possibly another day or so. But, as far as the name “Charley Horse” goes, we have baseball to thank for that term. Its etymology isn’t 100% certain, but archived newspaper articles from the time suggest that it was coined by a baseball player in the 1880s. However, which player or why they said it, we’ll likely never really know.

“Charley Horse” was a phrase well-known to baseball players around 1887, but not the average Joe. Though it was mentioned in a bunch of newspapers across the US during that time, almost every one of the mentioning publications had a different account of the term’s origin.

The most likely version revolves around John Wesley “Jack” Glasscock, a shortstop for Indianapolis, who’d strained a thigh tendon during a game & went home to his family farm afterward. His father, who’d been looking after a lame old horse called “Charley”, saw his son limping along & reportedly said, “Why, John, my boy, what’s the matter…you go just like the old Charley horse?” John allegedly shared the funny phrase with teammates, and it spread from there.

Some said it had nothing to do with a live animal, but instead that, while running, an injured player resembles a rocking horse or a kid riding a wooden hobby horse.

Another theory had some players going to the races & betting on a horse named Charley who “pulled up lame in the final stretch”. The next day, when a player pulled a tendon, he was said to resemble “our old Charlie horse.”

It could also relate to the old workhorses that pulled rollers across the infield. Often in the 1800s, old workhorses kept on the grounds of ballparks were called Charley. So, the movements of injured, stiff-legged ballplayers were likened to the plodding old horses, with the injury itself becoming known as a “charley” or “charley horse”.

So there you have it. While we may never know the exact origin of the charley horse, at least the next time you get a sharp pain in your leg you’ll be able to thank an old-timey baseball player for making your affliction sound ridiculous.

Got a Mundane Mystery you’d like solved? Send me a message via social media (@AndyWebbRadioVoice), or shoot me an email at [email protected].

MUNDANE MYSTERIES: Can You Vote From Space?

NASA astronaut Kate Rubins officially voted earlier this week from a makeshift booth aboard the International Space Station. As cool as it might’ve been for her to have had her ballot zoomed back to Earth by a tiny rocket, it was actually much more boring than that…it basically got sent to her county clerk digitally as a PDF.

According to NASA, you can vote from space! It begins the same way as voting anywhere else here on Earth. Astronauts are like military members & other American citizens living overseas: they have to first submit a Federal Postcard Application to request an absentee ballot. Once they’re approved, astronauts can blast off knowing their ballot will be right behind them.

The astronaut’s county clerk completes a practice round with folks at the Johnson Space Center in Houston before starting the actual voting process. The astronaut receives 2 electronic documents: a password-protected ballot sent by mission control, and a password email sent by their county clerk. The astronaut then fills out their ballot & “downlinks” it back to Space Center attendants via satellite signal, who forward it to the county clerk. Since a password’s required to open the ballot, that clerk is the only other person who sees the astronaut’s votes. They then copy them onto a regular paper ballot & submit them with all the rest.

When Americans first started visiting space more than 50 years, those early trips weren’t really long enough to have to worry about voting while in orbit. But, in 1996, astronaut John Blaha missed out on voting in the general election because his spaceflight to Russia’s Mir space station happened in September, before absentee voters received their ballots. He didn’t return until January 1997, so he wasn’t able to vote. So, NASA officials collaborated with Texas government leaders to pass a law allowing astronauts to cast their ballots from space. In the Fall of 1997, David Wolf became the first astronaut to submit his vote from a space station. The law is specific to Texas, since most active astronauts reside there, but NASA says the process can be done from other states if need be.

We have it a lot easier, so there’s no excuse not to get out & vote on Tuesday!

Got a Mundane Mystery you’d like solved? Send me a message via social media (@AndyWebbRadioVoice), or shoot me an email at [email protected].

MUNDANE MYSTERIES: When Does A President’s Term Actually End?

Most people are vaguely aware that U.S. presidents take over the office at some point in January (the 20th, to be precise). But, did you know that it’s actually illegal for an outgoing president to continue serving after January 20th? Per law, a presidential term must be exactly 4 years long, down to the hour. Since the 20th Amendment took effect, there have been 3 times where January 20th fell on a Sunday. In those cases, the presidents took their oaths of office in private ceremonies on the 20th, before a public inauguration was held on the 21st.

That 4-year term limit’s been a part of the Constitution since the beginning. But, January 20th wasn’t always the official start/end date, it used to be March 4th up until 1933. The Constitution had been adopted in June 1788, and the U.S. Congress didn’t begin until March 4th, 1789, and George Washington wasn’t sworn in as our first president until April 30th. But, as of Washington’s 2nd term, the official presidential Inauguration Day was moved up to March 4th.

Fast forward to the early 20th century, and America was starting to have problems with how long it was taking for officials to actually start their job after winning election. Congressional delegates, who were elected in November, didn’t start their first session until the following December…a full 13 months later! Then, their 2nd session, which started the December after that, was only allowed to last until their terms ended on March 4th. So, in the 1930’s, Congress passed the 20th Amendment, which ordered congressional terms to begin & end on January 3rd, around 2 months after the election. Oh, and the president’s inauguration day also got shifted to January, as well (the 20th, to be precise).

The 20th Amendment also laid out what had to happen if a president wasn’t chosen by January 20th. The sitting president wouldn’t just stay in office by default; Congress either has to appoint someone to serve in the interim, or choose another way of selecting someone. Then, that person would serve until a President or Vice president qualified. But, that’s never happened before, so we don’t really know just how that might all play out.

Got a Mundane Mystery you’d like solved? Send me a message via social media (@AndyWebbRadioVoice), or shoot me an email at [email protected].

{Katie’s Kitchen} Halloween Spider Cookies

Brought to you by Caoctin Mountain Orchard.

Need an easy treat to take to a Halloween party, last minute?! Here you go…

I grabbed a package of break apart peanut butter cookies from Reeses and baked them according to the package.

Right out of the oven, I placed cold (out of the freezer) Reeses Cups upside down on top in the middle of the cookie while they were still hot.

Then, you could either use melted chocolate (chocolate chips) or icing, like I did, and put a little on the back of your candy eyes and place on top (or sides) of your Reeses cups. Next, add your spider legs! Again, you can use melted chocolate and put it in a baggie and cut a small hole from the corner to pipe the legs onto the cookies….or you can use a tube of icing.

Place them in the refrigerator for a few minutes to set and you’re done!

INGREDIENTS:

-Peanut butter cookies (homemade or pull apart)

-Reeses cups (25-30 count)

-melted chocolate chips/ icing

{Katie’s Baby Blog} Halloween Plans!

I’m excited that Lily is finally old enough to have fun with Halloween activities this year!

We went to the farm…she didn’t love that except for the animals, but we tried! She did LOVE painting pumpkins!

 

 

I bought her an Abby Cadabby costume for Halloween, it’s so cute! I can’t wait for her to wear it…she loves Abby cadabby and has the perfect doll to carry around with her. We are planning on doing a “Trunk or Treat” event at my friend’s house that she set up for close friends! Should be fun!

I’m just hoping Lily wants to put the costume on…I’ve tried once to try it on her and it was a big ‘no-go’. I’m hoping she was just tired and grouchy that day 🙂

Updates next week!

<3 Katie Ryan!

MUNDANE MYSTERIES: “I Approve This Message!”

With Election Day less than a week away, we’ve all heard & seen plenty of campaign ads on Radio & TV, which almost always end with a disclaimer that the politician being advocated has authorized the spot. Usually, the person says “I approve this message.” So, that’s obviously a requirement, right? But why?

The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, passed in 2002, was intended to legitimize campaign contributions by forbidding large corporate donations. Part of the Act, called the Stand By Your Ad provision, mandates that anyone running for federal office has to personally “approve” the message as part of their campaign commercials. The goal was to curb the overt mudslinging of candidates relentlessly insulting & accusing each another. Lawmakers hoped political candidates would, therefore, be less likely to utilize dirty tactics & then attempt to deny involvement. Basically, it was self-imposed campaign shaming.

The Federal Election Commission is highly specific about how the disclaimer should appear: the written form has to come at the end of each ad, appear for at least 4 seconds, be readable against a contrasting background, and take up at least 4% of the vertical picture height. The candidate will usually then say their name & speak the message aloud. Messages not approved by a candidate typically name the entity responsible, whether a political committee, group, or person. There’s also usually language about who financed the commercial.

But, have things actually worked out how lawmakers intended? Well, research from the Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley in 2018 shows…not so much.

In 2000, negative campaign ads made up 29% of all political persuasion spots. in 2012, that number rose to 64%. In the week before the 2016 presidential election, 92% of ads were negative. But, the appearance of federal regulation, even if there’s no actual regulatory approval over a statement, seems to give messages credibility. As long as a candidate “approves” a message, whether positive or negative, voters tend to be more likely to perceive their subjective statements as truth. Just like all I’ve just told you.

I’m Andy Webb, and I approve this message.

Got a Mundane Mystery you’d like solved? Send me a message via social media (@AndyWebbRadioVoice), or shoot me an email at [email protected].

MUNDANE MYSTERIES: Why Do Supreme Court Justices Serve For Life?

While most political officials serve for a defined period of time, U.S. Supreme Court Justices serve for life (which can span more than 3 decades nowadays). Potentially, justices appointed in the 21st century could sit on the Supreme Court for an average total of 35 years, thanks to longer lifespans, as compared to the average span of around 16 years in the past. Because of this shift, some experts question whether lifetime appointments are still appropriate, since the definition of “for life” has changed so much since the Constitution was written. But, why do justices serve for life, anyway?

The Constitution doesn’t really specify a time frame, per se, stating only that judges “hold their offices during good behavior.” So, while a judge could be removed for “bad behavior”, no other limits are placed on their term. In essence, they have their seat for life, unless they’re impeached & removed by Congress.

The point of justices being given a seat on the bench for life (or, more commonly these days, until they retire) is to shield the nation’s highest court from partisan infighting. The Supreme Court acts as a check against the power of the President & Congress. The lifetime appointment is designed to ensure that justices are insulated from political pressure so the court can be a truly independent branch of government. Justices can’t be fired if they make unpopular decisions, so they can focus on the law instead of politics. And, while a justice might be nominated because a president sees them as a political ally, once they’re on the bench, they can’t be recalled, even if their ideology shifts.

Most other democracies in the world have mandatory retirement ages or term limits for high court judges. But, while the U.S. Supreme Court has never had them, recent serious proposals have attempted to implement them. One popular suggestion among political analysts & scholars is to implement an 18-year term limit. Critics of that particular plan, however, point out its potential to, at some point, enable a single president to end up appointing the majority of the justices on the court. In any case, any change would require a constitutional amendment, meaning it’s probably not gonna happen anytime soon. So, for the foreseeable future, being a Supreme Court justice continues to be a lifetime commitment.

Got a Mundane Mystery you’d like solved? Send me a message via social media (@AndyWebbRadioVoice), or shoot me an email at [email protected].

MUNDANE MYSTERIES: Why Are Elections On Tuesdays?

Ever wondered why we, as Americans, always seem to vote on Tuesdays? Well, there are reasons why that is. Farming reasons.

 

Back in 1788, states would determine their own voting dates. But, it was a logistical nightmare: a national patchwork quilt of elections across the country, on different dates & at different times, all to choose Presidential electors who would ultimately cast their votes on the 1st Wednesday in December (the date set forth in the Constitution). So, in 1792, a law was passed that required state elections to be held within a 34-day window before the 1st Wednesday in December. Most elections then started taking place in November.

 

Ours was a mostly agricultural society back then. So, having elections in November meant that crops had already been harvested & winter hadn’t taken hold yet. It the perfect time to vote for our young, agrarian country.

 

Now, back in the late 18th & early 19th centuries, the super-slow pace of presidential elections wasn’t that big of an issue: communication was understandably slow everywhere, with results taking weeks to tally & announce anyway. But, once the railroad & the telegraph came into being, Congress figured that a standardized date needed to be established. Monday was a no-go, since that would require folks to travel to the polls by horse & buggy on the Sunday Sabbath. Wednesday wasn’t good, either, because that was market day & farmers wouldn’t be able to make it to the polls since that’s when they’d be buying & selling their wares. Tuesday, it seemed, was the day that most Americans could vote in federal elections. So, in 1845, Congress passed a law mandating that presidential elections be held on the Tuesday after the 1st Monday in November.

 

And, guess what…that’s next Tuesday! A week from tomorrow! You’ve got the opportunity to make a difference, so get out & vote!

 

Got a Mundane Mystery you’d like solved? Send me a message via social media (@AndyWebbRadioVoice), or shoot me an email at [email protected].